While reading Peter Westmore’s “I accuse A Travesty of
justice” I couldn’t help but think of the “scapegoat phenomenon.” This is
the phenomenon where a victim will be chosen or indeed a substitute is chosen
to atone for sins in lieu for the sins of the real sinners, and this victim
will be seen to expiate and have atoned for the “sins” of the others. We have
Jesus as the most perfect “scapegoat”
It is an interesting phenomenon because we in our
enlightened society would be scandalized to think that we would use or
have a “scapegoat” mentality or even think of punishing anyone other than the
guilty party, but the reality is that we have recently been made privy to this
phenomenon. The media in all its forms has clearly shown that someone has to
“pay” for the “sins” of those offending and molesting priests of long ago.
The media in all its forms (print/visual/social) which we
know even supported the victims and their supporters to travel all the way to
Rome, to confront Cardinal Pell as he gave his evidence, together with Counsel
for the Commission, who seemed intent on breaking down the voluntary witness
(Pell) showed an intensity of fury against the witness (Pell) that one would
have thought that it was he himself who was responsible for all the criminal
acts committed. That he was the criminal. That it was he who had
committed all the offending acts.
The scapegoating phenomenon can be found in all manner of
situations where it seems like an injustice has been committed and no
reparation done. The “sin” has not supposedly been atoned
for and so sinner/s appear to have escaped punishment.
A “scapegoat” is chosen because of some link or association and for no
other reason the denunciation, humiliation, persecution and removal from the
community begins in earnest and persists until the “scapegoat” is finished,
that is, dead.
Whilst scapegoating is not a preferred term but a more
modern term “witch-hunt” was used in the Pell experience I would suggest
scapegoating is a more apt description because of the wave of hatred against
the Cardinal and the Catholic Church, which was incited by all forms of
media and media personalities and which was also clearly demonstrated in the
conduct of the members of the Royal Commission itself.
The anti-Pell saga played out before the eyes of the world
and was done with the sole purpose of bringing down Cardinal Pell, to make him
pay. To humiliate him, to embarrass him and the Church and to call into
question his position at the Vatican.
Someone had to pay for the sins of Ridsdale, Searson, Day,
Ryan, and all the other other offending priests and the bigger the scalp the
better the prize.