Wednesday 26 December 2012
World Congress of Families 2013
Dear Friends,
Please look at the link below and make this the place to go and the place to be
May 15-18, 2013.
I went to the 2012 WCF in Madrid and it was spectacular, 2013 WCF in Sydney
promises to be more spectacular. In a beautiful city, with speakers extraordinaire, during a time of the year which is beautiful in Australia, and the congress itself to defend family in its natural formation and understanding. Lets gather together.
Be early to book as it is expected that it will be booked out.
Hope to meet you there my friends .
Anne.
http://wcfsydney2013.org.au/
Saturday 22 December 2012
A Happy and Holy Christmas
Dear Friends,
I wish for you a Happy and Holy Christmas
And a New Year filled with graces, blessings and friendships
which last forever.
God Bless
Anne
I wish for you a Happy and Holy Christmas
And a New Year filled with graces, blessings and friendships
which last forever.
God Bless
Anne
Monday 17 December 2012
Violence of Abortion.
Abortion
by its very nature is a violent act. It is the intentional destruction of a
very small child, by a so-called doctor and with the compliance/insistence of
one or both of its parents or significant others. We now know that there are
psychological sequelae to abortion. The woman experiences life long after
effects whilst the male is also affected but differently, generally through his
sense of impotence in the matter. For the male it is often the sense of
helplessness at being unable to do anything to protect his child and this anger
is then turned inwards to self punish or outwards also as a self punishment in type of violent behaviour.
Prior
to the birth of the baby, the father has absolutely no rights in respect of the
child. He cannot do anything to protect the life of his child and if the mother
of that child does not want to sustain, keep, or give birth to that child then
there is no one who can prevent the abortion from happening. No-one, including
the state, because the state has purchased into the argument by legislating
that the life of that new individual whilst in utero is a nonentity, and
therefore dependent upon the whim of the host body. Legislation has not decreed that the
relationship between woman and infant is symbiotic but at the same time the
infant is independent and deserving of the utmost respect. It has in fact decreed that the life or death
of that infant is dependent upon the vagaries of the stronger of the two
parties.
For the woman,
in her very being there is a rupture unlike any other. There is a grief
quite unlike any other. The kind of wrenching grief which is the result of
guilt. The kind of grief which is the result of the intent behind the loss. The
kind of grief which says, powerlessness, hopelessness, utter despair. That is the kind of grief which abortion
leaves in its wake and is the legacy for the woman and man (either short term
or long term) who have acceded to the abortion experience.
The
violence we are daily seeing through all forms of media is symptomatic of the
“just below the surface” violence within the community. There is a tension,
which must be released and will not evaporate without leaving in its wake a
disaster.
Perhaps
an explanation of the unconscious response to abortion and the violence inherent in it, may shed some light on this era of violence.
Since the onset of the culture of the “pill” and “self-ism” the woman has
progressively taken control of her fertility and her body. And indeed to be
able to understand her body and to guard and protect her body as inviolate is a
good thing. However, this is not what
has happened. The woman has demanded control over her body in as far as her
fertility is concerned, and has removed from her husband/partner any rights and
responsibility towards an act which has resulted in a conception. This has led to decisions to end the life within her.
This, taking control, "its my body I will do with it what I want" whilst ostensibly “good” as far as some
men and women are concerned has ultimately failed all.
Today, whether he chooses or not, a man can
walk away from his responsibility towards a child he has engendered. Conversely
should he choose not to walk away from the responsibility it can be forcibly
wrenched from him so that he cannot do anything to change the situation. The
removal of responsibility has not spelled equal rights, as has been suggested,
but indeed unequal suffering. The woman suffers lifelong anguish. Yes it’s
real. It happens even for those who blithely believe that it hasn’t affected
them. The man suffers loss of something of his essence, of his fatherhood, of
his fathering, of his manhood.
For the state and nation which has decreed that
the killing of its future citizens is lawful, there is to be other losses which
cannot ever be recouped.
All citizens begin their life as zygotes, embryos,
fetuses, babies, young ones, adolescents, youth, and mature individuals. Citizens of a nation have not just been
deposited there from outer space. They have been conceived and permitted to be
born and to be members of the state, nation, and above all humanity. Abortion of an in utero infant must lead to death at other end of life because not enough citizens born to maintain the other end of life.
Sadly what the state of Victoria and following
all states (as is the intention) has now done is enshrined into its
statutes, a law which says that infants are not really wanted. The death of pre born infants to 40 weeks. Full mature babies.
What a great tragedy that the women themselves
have demanded their own extinction because at least 50% of infants killed are
little baby girls.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)